SonOfRaisbeck
member
Reged: 10/06/2007
Posts: 33
|
|
Quote:
Cannot believe these two goals never made the top 20. The first goal scored by George Weah was better than Ryan Giggs goal v Arsenal although the Welshman's finish was far better scoring from a tighter angle but Weah's run was superior and covered a greater distance to Giggs', both who similarly where fortunate with ricochet's off defenders in their own build ups. The second goal, well have you ever witnessed a ball moving in flight as much as the Brazilians effort.
No argument from me! I seem to remember half-watching the Milan game live on Channel 4. I started paying attention when Weah was somewhere near the halfway line and I realised something VERY special was happening.
As for RC's free-kick, one of the major US TV channels voted it their "Sports Play of the Year". Of every moment, of every sport in the world, they were most impressed by that goal: speaks volumes, really. I like to imagine what must've been going through the mind of the defender at the end of the wall (Didier Deschamps?) as he saw the ball apparently speeding towards the corner flag.
Greatest Team - I would've thought Brian Glanville would've insisted on Il Gran Torino!
Greatest Matches - No place in the Top 20 for West Ham v Liverpool in 2006 FA Cup Final? (Or, for that matter, Luton v Liverpool in that season's 3rd Round?) Laying aside my Liverpool bias - How about the Spain v Yugoslavia epic at Euro 2000?
Greatest Article - Tim Vickery's piece on Pele & Maradona is the closest thing to the definitive word on these two brilliant, flawed men.
|
SonOfRaisbeck
member
Reged: 10/06/2007
Posts: 33
|
|
Quote:
But please dont tell me that Liverpool's ridiculously unjust and almost entirely accidental six-minute pantomime comeback in the 2005 Champions League final makes the game the second best ever. The best team didnt win. It was football at its worst, not its best.
All depends what you're looking for. Some games are remembered as great examples of the Beautiful Game, some as pure theatre. This is one match that combines both elements. I think it was Sacchi who said the first half was an exhibition of football, the second half an exhibition of sport. Put them together and you get an undeniably great spectacle that enthralled the world.
|
Frrènkie
member
Reged: 13/07/2007
Posts: 1
|
|
I agree with the top 3's in all categories, but in general I think the list is a bit too British (e.g. Ricky Villa, Archie Gemmill, Blackpool-Bolton, Tottenham 1961).
The goals I have missed in the "Greatest goals" list: - Nayim's 50 m lob (Real Zaragoza-Arsenal 1995) - Ronald Koeman's free kick (Barcelona-Sampdoria 1992) - Madjer's magical heel (FC Porto-Bayern Munich 1987) In my view Saeed Owairan's goal has been overrated, whereas Carlos Alberto's might have been given a better place (especially for the build-up: I guess that the whole team touched the ball before it hit the net).
As for the matches of all time, I am surprised not to see Milan-Barcelona 4-0 (1994) in the list.
These comments notwithstanding: a nice list that evokes many sweet old memories!
|
roberto
member
Reged: 13/07/2007
Posts: 2
|
|
Where it is the Santos of years 60 - 70 of Pelé, Coutinho, Pagão and Pepe in the list of the best team of the world. A list of this is a nonsense not to have this teams who was bi- champion world. A terrible injustice
|
badgerboy
member
Reged: 26/03/2007
Posts: 727
Loc: Bucks, England
|
|
Quote:
I disagree with the view that WS should stick with "current issues" and the modern game but would've appreciated the historic articles more if they had perhaps taken the "alternative approach" that they did with the players (only using better criteria for inclusion!). Giving coverage either to recent games, teams, goals that are somehow "underrated" or older "forgotten" ones. I'll give some examples in the thread set up to discuss "The Greatest" later.
The above is just transferring part of my own quote from the "summer" thread to put some of what follows into "context".
First a few comments on what WS did include in their lists.
Teams. Nothing much to add that hasn't already been said. I'd put the French team of the 1980s ahead of that of the late 1990s. And I'd put a question mark against the inclusion of the Denmark 1986 team - great as some of their football was - how good were Butragueno's Spain that beat them 5-1 or even the Belgian side of Scifo & Ceulemans that saw off the Spanish? It's hard to comment about the merits of most of the British teams on the list - mainly before my time. Liverpool 1977 (or at least "Liverpool of the late 1970s")OK but United 1999? I might say the same about Real Madrid 1998. Maybe just "better known" rather than "better" than much that has gone before.
Matches. I'd agree Liverpool v Milan is far too high. And I suppose on the whole list it's true (and to an extent logical) that the "occasion" has been given huge weight when deciding the "greatness" of a match. What I mean by this is that there may be quite a few domestic league matches through history - both in Europe & South America - as well as thrilling ties in early rounds of continental competitions that bear favourable comparison as viewing spectacles with the games on the list. But there is no comparison when you take into account the magnitude of the occasion. Are the Finals of competitions really the "best matches" as often as the list would suggest?
Again the inclusion of Manchester United v Bayern on the list is strange. A bit like saying Arsenal-Manchester United (1979) was the greatest FA Cup Final ever because of the last five minutes. Surely United's comeback against Juventus in Turin was far more thrilling for example - but then there seems to be a rule against including games that form part of a two-legged tie...
Another big question mark would have to go against Germany v Italy from the last World Cup. I'm really not sure that any game from that World Cup deserves a place in the list of "top 20 games ever" but surely Argentina v Mexico was the best in the competition in any case...
Goals. I'm less inclined to argue here not because there's no reason to argue but because remembering (& differentiating between) individual moments of brilliance isn't my strength. I leave that to others who are better at such things.
Alternative World top 10. I'd take issue with Sam here not because he's wrong in raving about Garrincha but because I don't think WS's intention is to highlight the "next best 10". Of the players listed only one (Duncan Edwards) made the top 100 in 1999 & - perhaps more surprisingly - only one more (Obdulio Varela) made it into the booklets WS produced in the build up to the "reader vote". For me the pieces on Zizinho & Alberto Spencer are exactly the sort of things WS should be doing in their "historical section". Unfortunately for me the rest of the list failed on two counts. First the reasons for inclusion - which in some cases just seemed to be getting a lot of caps for your country - whatever their level of football. Second - & perhaps more importantly - the lack of depth to the information about anyone except Zizinho & Spencer. I'd much rather see five players covered properly -maybe add Ali Daei, Varela & Figueroa from the eight in the article - than reading very little information about more players which turns into little more than a list. As for players missing from the piece - given what I've already said about Garrincha (yes he probably should be in the top ten but isn't as "unknown" as some) the name I'd put forward would be Eduard Streltsov. Again he's not entirely unknown - his story was covered as part of a BBC documentary & in a chapter in the book on Eastern European football Sam has just started to read but I'd still suggest he's an "unknown great" to most of the football world.
Now - after a longer digression than I'd intended - back to the "alternative approach" I mentioned above. I guess you could call the following lists (of teams & matches - I'm not sure there will be any goals) a list of those I'd either like to know more about myself or like to see WS bringing to the attention of a wider audience - usually both of these things at the same time.
Teams
I'd certainly like to know more about the great South American club sides others have already mentioned on this thread. I also made a note from somewhere (it might even have been this thread I'm not sure!) about the Boca team of the early 1930s...
1. Uruguay - late 1920s & early 1930s. Twice Olympic Champions (when this meant a lot) & winners of the first World Cup.
2. Austria - Hugo Meisl's "wunderteam" of the early 1930s which included Matthias Sindelar.
3. Czechoslovakia - the team that apparently played the most attractive football in the 1934 World Cup.
4. Honved - great Hungarian club side of the early 1950s. I'd add to this a number of "Central European" club sides (Austria, Czechoslovakia & Hungary) prior to the era of the European Cup.
5. Yugoslavia - the team that reached the World Cup semi-finals in 1962. This is the first in a list of teams that perhaps (indeed almost certainly) weren't "the best" even of their own era but were excellent sides that are far less written about (& hence known) than those that were. "Underrated" teams perhaps.
6. Portugal 1966. Perhaps not as "unknown" as some other teams - thanks to Eusebio & the fact they played against England.
7. Peru 1970. The side of Cubillas.
8. Poland 1974. Boniek is always touted as Poland's "greatest ever player" but perhaps their greatest team was in the pre-Boniek days of 1974 when Lato won the Golden Shoe & Poland finished third.
9. Borussia Monchengladbach 1970s - Five times domestic champions, European Cup finalists, twice UEFA Cup winners & twice losing finalists (back when it was often a harder competition to win than the Champions Cup).
10. Huddersfield Town 1920s - first English club to win three successive titles. managed by Herbert Chapman before he moved to Arsenal.
Stephen mentioned the Everton side of the 1980s but - perhaps to highlight the "difficulty" of such discussions. Was that even the best Everton side ever? What about Harry Catterick's 1960s side with the "Three Graces" of Kendall, Harvey & Ball?
Matches
I'm sticking mostly to World Cup games here - mostly from the pre-TV era but also some more recent games I remember personally: 1. Czechoslovakia 3 Switzerland 2 (1934 WC QF) 2. Brazil 6 Poland 5 (1938 WC R1) 3. Austria 7 Switzerland 5 (1954 WC QF) 4. Brazil 5 France 2 (1958 WC SF) 5. Portugal 5 North Korea 3 (1966 WC QF) 6. Hungary 3 Brazil 1 (1966 WC GS) 7. Romania 3 Argentina 2 (1994 WC L16) 8. Sweden 2 Romania 2 (5-4 pens) (1994 WC QF) 9. Spain 4 Yugoslavia 3 (Euro 2000 - GS)
To these I'll add a few games I know absolutely nothing about but which featured in the December 1999 issue as "most memorable matches" from various WS correspondents:
Denmark 4 USSR 2 (1985 WCQ) - Jim Holden Benfica 5 Sporting Lisbon 4 (1952 Portuguese Cup Final) - Alberto Da Silva Argentina 2 Peru 2 (1985 WCQ) - Paul Gardner Japan 3 Iran 2 (1997 WCQ) - Michael Church E. Frankfurt 1 Duisburg 0 (1975 W. German Cup Final) - Nicholas Harling.
Goals
I'm not sure if this is one of the "greatest ever" but these clips of Franz Beckenbauer from 1966 show a few things. Of course I know Beckenbauer as one of "the greats" but until I recently watched some 1966 highlights that weren't based solely around England's victory I didn't realise quite how good he was that early. See in particular the second goal against Switzerland (the one I'm naming as at least a "contender" for greatness). I also didn't realise quite how good Germany were in 1966 - see the quality of the first goal from a "team" perspective" as well as a number of other clips in the piece.
Edited by badgerboy (14/07/2007 17:18)
|
Historyman
member
Reged: 14/07/2007
Posts: 240
|
|
It's a wonderful list, but I feel uncomfortable with Liverpool v Milan at number 2. Is it not too early to judge how highly football history will rate this match? There's no doubting the potential greatness of this encounter, but how can the seminal European Cup final between Real Madrid and Eintracht Frankfurt be ranked one place lower? Puskas himself said that the Frankfurt players 'stood and watched us' - such was the mesmerising quality of Madrid's play. I don't recall too many Milan players doing likewise! The 2005 final was amazing, but will it achieve immortality like the 1960 final? We'll know in about 45 years' time....
|
steve31
member
Reged: 15/07/2007
Posts: 476
Loc: the wirral
|
|
maradonas goal was without doubt the greatest goal ever!van bastens volley could have gone anywhere?as for the greatest team i still say the everton team of 85.never able to play in the european cup!
|
Sam
member
Reged: 12/07/2006
Posts: 1063
Loc: North Somerset (returning to M...
|
|
Quote:
4. Honved - great Hungarian club side of the early 1950s. I'd add to this a number of "Central European" club sides (Austria, Czechoslovakia & Hungary) prior to the era of the European Cup.
Oh God yes, how did I forget to mention THEM! I saw Honvéd play Ferencváros in Budapest last year and was incredibly excited just to be seeing some representatives of the club that had once, in effect, inspired the formation of the European Cup. The fact that they were utterly useless in 2006 had very little to do with it.
Quote:
van bastens volley could have gone anywhere
Um, but it where did go, was right into the top corner. When Maradona touched it past Shilton before poking it home, Butcher could have absolutely flattened him and prevented that goal. But it was scored.
Sam
-------------------- More fútbol argentino than you can shake a mullet at - Hasta El Gol Siempre
|
ChrisM
member
Reged: 05/06/2007
Posts: 36
Loc: Cornwall, England.
|
|
I doubt many people would have seen it, but an all time great goal for me was by Gaizka Mendieta when he was at Valencia. Scored against Barcelona, he as well as the corner taker mastered their routines perfectly, the corner taker chipping the ball accurately to the edge of the area and Mendieta accurately slamming the ball home. The ball whisteled over the defender on the lines head so fast, that had it been blocked by his head it may potentially have caused injury. This goal stands out for me because of the perfect technique associated with both phases of the move, the chip and the volley. I can't actually recall anybody performing this routine with such success.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=yAnHIkaFy9Q
|
Sam
member
Reged: 12/07/2006
Posts: 1063
Loc: North Somerset (returning to M...
|
|
Beckham and Scholes did it against (correct me if I'm wrong) Southampton in about 1998. In 2005-2006 Xavi (I think) took a corner for Barca which Ronaldinho met with a proper, sideways, up-and-over volley (as opposed to the 'straighter' ones from Mendieta and Scholes) from about 25 yards which was brilliantly tipped round the post by the 'keeper. I can't remember who it was against but if that had gone in, it would have been astonishing.
Sam
-------------------- More fútbol argentino than you can shake a mullet at - Hasta El Gol Siempre
|
stephen_woodside
member
Reged: 02/05/2007
Posts: 1880
Loc: Huyton, Merseyside
|
|
Quote:
But please dont tell me that Liverpool's ridiculously unjust and almost entirely accidental six-minute pantomime comeback in the 2005 Champions League final makes the game the second best ever. The best team didnt win. It was football at its worst, not its best.
Quote:
All depends what you're looking for. Some games are remembered as great examples of the Beautiful Game, some as pure theatre. This is one match that combines both elements. I think it was Sacchi who said the first half was an exhibition of football, the second half an exhibition of sport. Put them together and you get an undeniably great spectacle that enthralled the world.
As an Evertonian, you can imagine how i felt after that match, as a spectacle however, it had everything. No more talk of what team done what in the game now, the fact was it was an on the end of your seats final. Not sure it deserves its placing in terms of greatness but saying that, have you ever seen such a pulsating, heart stopping final? Me having Blue persuasion was numb at the end of the game, i guess many Liverpool fans had a similar feeling for different reasons. To top it all off, will we ever see such a turn around in a result in such a massive game in our life time, perhaps and quite possibly not.
-------------------- Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Edited by stephen_woodside (17/07/2007 23:55)
|
s0cc3rba11
member
Reged: 14/05/2007
Posts: 1
|
|
George Weah's goal better than Ryan Giggs'? You must be joking! What made Giggsy's goal so special was who it was against (the Arsenal), when it was scored (extra time), the time it was scored (injury time), the conditions it was scored in (united had a man sent off) and what it led to - the treble!
|
brod104
member
Reged: 19/07/2007
Posts: 38
Loc: Sheffield, England
|
|
Goals:
I'm a little surprised that a goal by Clarence Seedorf while he was at Real Madrid wasn't included. Hit from just inside the Atletico Madrid half, it starts off going wide, and the keeper moves to the side of the net just to make sure. But as he does, the ball swerves and flies into the goal just below the centre of the bar without even starting to dip.
Another contender is Andres Vasquez in IFK Goteborg's 4-0 win over Orebro in Sweden. It looks a fluke at first, but Vasquez even did a TV piece explaining how he did it! Check it out on Youtube - it's fantastic! Much better than Messi in the Copa America this year.
I would also like to include Robin van Persie's volley for Arsenal against Charlton this season just gone. How he manages to get over the ball and keep it down is beyond me! The camera behind Eboue's cross gives the best angle.
Teams: I think that Arsenal's 'Invincibles' from a few years ago should be included. Not only did they win the league unbeaten in the middle of a 49 game run without a defeat in the league, but they did it whilst playing some fantastic football.
Btw, I'm a Liverpool fan, so I'm not biased in Arsenal's favour. On that note, I don't suppose we could include a club based on their cup performances, in which case I would like to put forward Liverpool's cup teams 2004-2007. Even though league performances were usually average, you can't really argue with two Champions League finals in three years, an FA Cup win, a Club World Championship final appearance and an unlucky League Cup defeat (as well as a Community Shield win).
Games: The 2006 FA Cup final between Liverpool and West Ham was one of the best matches I've ever seen. For the second year running, I was considering walking away from the TV after 20 minutes of a Liverpool cup final performance. I'm glad I didn't! There was so much attacking football, and even through the TV there was a great atmosphere. What a shame that such a fantastic final was followed by such a dull final the following year! I also thought the 3rd round tie against Luton was a superb game as well - Luton played brilliantly against more glamorous opposition, but unluckily for them, they were up against the comeback kings.
|
righteous1
member
Reged: 16/03/2007
Posts: 553
|
|
Quote:
Beckham and Scholes did it against (correct me if I'm wrong) Southampton in about 1998. In 2005-2006 Xavi (I think) took a corner for Barca which Ronaldinho met with a proper, sideways, up-and-over volley (as opposed to the 'straighter' ones from Mendieta and Scholes) from about 25 yards which was brilliantly tipped round the post by the 'keeper. I can't remember who it was against but if that had gone in, it would have been astonishing.
Sam
I have got a feeling the Scholes effort was against Bradford at Valley Parade, unless he has done it more than once?
|
stephen_woodside
member
Reged: 02/05/2007
Posts: 1880
Loc: Huyton, Merseyside
|
|
Quote:
George Weah's goal better than Ryan Giggs'? You must be joking! What made Giggsy's goal so special was who it was against (the Arsenal), when it was scored (extra time), the time it was scored (injury time), the conditions it was scored in (united had a man sent off) and what it led to - the treble!
Regardless of the match situation at the current time, Weah's goal was still better, taking off those red tainted sunglasses you have been wearing in an unusual sunny day in Manchester today, you would admit it. Both goals where very similar in terms of a fortunate ricochet or two off defenders along the way and yes, Giggs's goal was far better in terms of the final finish but Weah's beats it every time in terms of where he picked the ball up and the length he carriied it. Once again, and i am becoming tired of it now, we once again have yet another comment over the quality/or lack of it regarding the opposition. A goal is a goal whether it be scored against Accrington Stanley or Real Madrid. All teams put infront of you have to be beaten regardless of their strengths and weaknesses and goals such as Weah's and Giggs's in the games involved, are not repeated too often. Lets not forget one major issue here, Weah's memorable goal was scored against a side in the same League as Milan's so comparing quality of opposing side's is one not called for, and two, is completely irrelevant. I thank you
-------------------- Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Edited by stephen_woodside (20/07/2007 00:13)
|
Historyman
member
Reged: 14/07/2007
Posts: 240
|
|
When we discuss the subject of 'greatest goals' it's often people's collective memory that influences their choices. Far more people are likely to have watched Gigg's goal live at the time, and can possibly remember where they were watching it and who they were watching it with. As time moves on it's likely that Weah's goal will become more of a footnote in history whereas Gigg's goal will have a chapter all to itself. Another point that may have a bearing here is that Weah's goal wasn't as decisive. According to the record books, it was in a 4-0 victory over Verona - Giggs scored the winning goal over Arsenal.
I'm not saying that Gigg's effort was better than Weah's, just that it will live longer in the memory, and so individuals will be more inclined to give it 'greatest goal' status.
|
steve31
member
Reged: 15/07/2007
Posts: 476
Loc: the wirral
|
|
um,but it where did go!!!double dutch like van basten,maradonas goal was pure genius butcher could have flattened him but he was to slow.as for van bastens volley it could have gone anywhere,look at zidanes volley in the euro final against leverkusen that was pure technique van bastens volley was one of those that could have gone into the stands.
|
GrahamBrack
member
Reged: 22/07/2007
Posts: 3
|
|
I wonder whether a great match has to be one in which both teams are well matched. In the top ten there are at least two games (Brazil-Italy and England-Hungary) in which one team barely got a touch. I grant the brilliance of Brazil and Hungary's play, but does that make it a great match?
We also have to consider the circumstances. For example, I don't think either the Liverpool-Arsenal last day championship decider or the Arsenal - Manchester Utd cup final in 1977 would rate a mention on quality of play, but often appear in polls because of what was at stake.
Personally, in terms of keeping me in my seat, I'd vote for the Belgium - USSR match in the second round of the 1986 World Cup, all the more remarkable for the pace it was played in despite the blistering heat in Leon.
|
Historyman
member
Reged: 14/07/2007
Posts: 240
|
|
It's nice to see a personal favourite mentioned, rather than one which is nominated by majority voting. That Belgium - USSR match was fantastic entertainment - Belanov scoring a hat-trick and still finishing up on the losing side! It was a 'red eye' match too, played in the early hours of the morning GMT. That was an interesting point about the pace of the match in the heat - when players today mention the heat as a reason for the slow pace of a game you do wonder how much of that is an excuse. Would the media have accepted that 20 years ago?
|
Sam
member
Reged: 12/07/2006
Posts: 1063
Loc: North Somerset (returning to M...
|
|
Quote:
as for van bastens volley it could have gone anywhere,look at zidanes volley in the euro final against leverkusen that was pure technique van bastens volley was one of those that could have gone into the stands.
Zidane himself has said of his volley that 'Nine times out of ten that would have gone into the stands'. I think World Soccer even quoted him as saying it in the article we're talking about. So sorry, but I'm not conceding that argument...
Sam
-------------------- More fútbol argentino than you can shake a mullet at - Hasta El Gol Siempre
|